Imagined interaction: visualizing human-machine communication
Abstract
We live in an age where consumer media technologies are hyped way before most people actually have a chance to engage with a physical product. Still, product representations, such as marketing videos, technical specifications and even software development kits provide certain clues to the capacities and limitations of the physical product in question. Prospective consumers are also increasingly invited to interact with technologies more distant in the future – via for example design fiction videos and technology vloggers. The ‘virtual products’ represented there also entice users to imagine how future interaction would take place (which they vividly do). From this premise, this paper explores what we may call imagined human-machine interaction. Put simply, this entails an interest in the intentions and concerns that come with engaging with media technologies implicitly – i.e. through representations of different kinds (which may have different underpinning agendas). However, as we shall see, retaining a notion of strict implicitness or immateriality is difficult. Theories around imaginary media, performative prototypes and design fiction challenge any firm separation of material and immaterial technologies, pointing us towards developed studies of imagined human-machine interaction.
Downloads
References
Bleecker, J. (2009). Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. San Francisco: Near Future Laboratory.
Blythe, M., & Encinas, E. (2016). The Co-ordinates of Design Fiction: Extrapolation, Irony, Ambiguity and Magic. The 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’16). Sanibel Island, Florida: ACM.
Cheikh-Ammar, M. (2018). The IT artifact and its spirit: a nexus of human values, affordances, symbolic expressions, and IT features. European Journal of Information Systems. http://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1436025
Fuller, M., & Goffey, A. (2012). EvilMedia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Malden, MA: Polity.
Gernsback, H. (2016). The Perversity of Things: Hugo Gernsback on Media, Tinkering, and Scientifiction. (G. Wythoff, Ed.). Minneapolis, MI: The University of Minnesota Press.
Grusin, R. (2004). Premediation. Criticism, 46(1), 17–39.
Hess, E. D., & Ludwig, K. (2017). Humility is the New Smart: Rethinking Human Excellence in the SmartMachine Age. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Honeycutt, J. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Daydreaming about communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Keen, A. (2015). The Internet is not the answer. London: Atlantic Books.
Kirby, D. (2010). The Future is Now: Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-world Technological Development. Social Studies of Science, 40(1), 41–70.
Kluitenberg, E. (2011). On the archaeology of imaginary media. In E. Huhtamo & J. Parikka(Eds.), Media archaeology: Approaches, applications, and implications(pp. 48–69). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as Theatre. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
Lindley, J., & Coulton, P. (2015). Back to the Future: 10 Years of Design Fiction. The 2015 British HCI Conference. Lincoln, UK: ACM.
May-raz, E., & Lazo, D. (2012). Sight(p. 7mins 49secs). Jerusalem, Israel: Bezaleal Academy of Arts.
McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital Disconnect. New York: The New Press.
Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Parikka, J. (2012). What is Media Archaeology? Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Pogue, D. (2007). The iPhone Matches Most of Its Hype. The New York Times.
Russell, D. M., & Yarosh, S. (2018). Can we look to science fiction for innovation in HCI? Interactions, 25(2), 36–40.Skågeby, J. (2011). Pre-produsage and the remediation of virtual products. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(1), 141–159.
Skågeby, J. (2014). Functionality. In K. Harvey (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics(pp. 559–560). London: Sage. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452244723.n224
Skågeby, J. (2015). Interpreting online discussions: connecting artefacts and experiences in user studies. The Qualitative Report, 20(1), 115–129
Skågeby, J. (2018). “Well-behaved Robots RarelyMake History”: coactive technologies and partner relations. Design and Culture. http://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1466567
Sugg, S. (2018). Slaughterbots(p. 7mins 47secs). Boston, USA: Future of Life Institute.
Talbott, S. (2007). Devices of the Soul: Battling for Our Selves in an Age of Machines. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
Tanenbaum, J. (2014). Design fictional interactions: why HCI should care about stories. Interactions, 21(5), 22–23.
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How collaboration changes everything. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation -The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin Press.
Wong, R. Y., Wyk, E. Van, & Pierce, J. (2017). Real-Fictional Entanglements: Using ScienceFiction and Design Fiction to Interrogate Sensing Technologies. The 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17). Edinburg, UK: ACM.
Zielinski, S. (2006). Deep Time of the Media: Toward and Archaeology of Hearing and Seeing by Technical Means. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Copyright (c) 2018 Jörgen Skågeby
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the JDMI agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0. This licensing allows others to share the work with no changes and acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but not for commercial use.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.
Additional Information
All correspondence concerning contributions, books and other review material should be sent to: deca-jdmi@ua.pt