Bullshit receptivity: what matters is who said it, not what is said
Abstract
The spread of political disinformation remains a problem for democracy. In a digital universe surrendered to the dominance of social media, motivated political reasoning can be an ally of disinformation in general. Our exploratory study is a first approach, in Portugal, to the analysis of receptivity to bullshit.The main objective is to verify how political and partisan orientation can influence the level of receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit. We used a survey (n = 268) to measure participants' partisanship and ideological orientation and to identify possible political and partisan (a)symmetries regarding receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit. Our findings revealed that individuals are less receptive to pseudo-profound bullshit attributed to political leaders than when the source is anonymous. Furthermore, partisanship, as motivated reasoning, can determine how respondents evaluate information. We found that the level of receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit is dependent on the political alignment of the source for left and right supporters. In addition to partisan bias, our results show that people with lower levels of education are more receptive to bullshit in general, which reinforces the need to invest in digital literacy to combat disinformation.
Downloads
References
Baptista, J. P., Correia, E., Gradim, A.,& Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2021a). The influence of political ideology on fake news belief: The Portuguese case. Publications, 9(2), 23.
Baptista, J. P., Correia, E. R., Alves, A. G., & Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2021b). Partisanship: the true allyof fake news? A comparative analysis of the effect on belief and spread. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 79, 23–46.
Baptista, J.P, & Loureiro, M. (2018). Ideologia Política Esquerda-Direita –Estudo Exploratório do Eleitorado Português. Interações: Sociedade e asNovasModernidades,0(35 SE-Artigos).
Bøggild, T. (2020). Politicians as party hacks: Party loyalty and public distrust in politicians. The Journal of Politics,82(4), 1516-1529.
Bobbio, N. (1995). Direita e esquerda: razões e significados de uma distinção política, Trad. Marco Aurélio Nogueira. São Paulo: UNESP.
Burger, A. M., Pfattheicher, S., & Jauch, M. (2020). Therole of motivation in the association of political ideology with cognitive performance. Cognition, 195, 104124.
Calvillo, D.P., Ross, B. J., Garcia, R. J. B., Smelter, T. J., & Rutchick, A. M. (2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of covid-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550620940539.
Carlson, M. (2018b). The information politics of journalism in a post-truth age. Journalism Studies,19(13), 1879–1888.
Čavojová,V., & Brezina, I. (2021). Everybody Bullshits Sometimes: Relationships of Bullshitting Frequency, Overconfidence and Myside Bias in the Topic of Migration. Studia Psychologica, 63(2), 158–174.
Čavojová, V., Brezina, I., & Jurkovič, M. (2020). Expanding the bullshit research out of pseudo-transcendental domain. Current Psychology, 1-10.
Čavojová, V., Secară, E.-C., Jurkovič, M., & Šrol, J. (2019).Reception and willingness to share pseudo-profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemicallysuspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakiaand Romania. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 299–311.
Clementson, D. E. (2018). Truth bias and partisan bias in political deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(4), 407–430.
Deppe, K. D., Gonzalez, F. J., Neiman, J. L., Jacobs, C., Pahlke, J., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2015).Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology. Judgment & Decision Making, 10(4).
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291.
Douglas, C. (2018). Religion and Fake News: Faith-Based Alternative Information Ecosystems in the US and Europe. The Review of faith & International Affairs, 16(1), 61–73.
Ehrlich, G. A., & Gramzow, R. H. (2015). The politics of affirmation theory: When group-affirmation leads to greater ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1110–1122.
Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., Tinghög, G., & Västfjäll, D.(2018). Bullshit-sensitivity predicts prosocial behavior. PloS One, 13(7), e0201474.
Evans, A., Sleegers, W., & Mlakar, Ž. (2020). Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 401.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 255–278.
Evans, J.S., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.
Faragó, L., Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2019). We only believe in news that we doctored ourselves: The connection between partisanship and political fake news. Social Psychology.
Faria, F. N., & Marchi, R. (2018). [Review of A Direita nunca Existiu. As Direitas Parlamentares na Institucionalização da Democracia Portuguesa 1976-1980]. Análise Social,53(228), 802–804.
Fernandes, J. M., & Magalhaes, P. C. (2020). The 2019 Portuguese general elections. West European Politics,43(4), 1038–1050.
Flanagan, S. C. (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1289–1319.
Frankfurt,H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton University Press.Freire, A. (2015). Left–right ideology as a dimension of identification andofcompetition.Journal of Political Ideologies,20(1), 43–68.
Freire, A. (2017). Para láda" geringonça": o governo de esquerdas em Portugal e na Europa. Lisboa: Contraponto.
Freire, A. (2005). Party system change in Portugal, 19742005: the role of social, political and ideological factors. Portuguese Journal of Social Science,4(2), 81–100.
Freire, A. (2009). A esquerda europeia ante os dilemas da imigração. Sociologia, 19, 255–279.Gligorić, V., Feddes, A., & Doosje, B. (2020). Political bullshit receptivity and its correlates: a cross-cultural validation of the concept.
Gligorić, V., & Vilotijević, A. (2020). “Who said it?” How contextual information influences perceived profundity of meaningful quotes and pseudo-profound bullshit. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 535–542.
Grady, R. H., Ditto, P. H., & Loftus, E. F. (2021). Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 52.
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374 LP –378.
Guedes, N. (2012). Convergência ideológica? Uma análise comparada dos programas eleitorais do PS e do PSD (1991-2009). Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,68, 103–125.
Guedes, N. (2016). Esquerda-direita: análise das posições ideológicas do PS e do PSD (1990-2010). Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 80, 95–116.
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586.
Harsin, J. (2018). Post-truth and critical communication studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.
Ilić, S., & Damnjanović, K. (2021). The effect of source credibility on bullshit receptivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(5), 1193–1205.
Issacharoff, S. (2018). Democracy’s deficits. The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 485–520.
Jalali, C., Moniz, J., & Silva, P. (2021). In the Shadow of the ‘Government of the Left’: The 2019 Legislative Elections in Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 1–27.
Jaster, R., & Lanius, D. (2018). What is fake news? Versus,47(2), 207–224.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339.
Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208.
Kakutani, M. (2019). The death of truth: Notes on Falsehood in the Age of Trump. Tim Duggan Books.
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., Van Prooijen, J. W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435-462.
Lachat, R. (2018). Which way from left to right? On the relation between voters’ issue preferences and left–right orientation in West European democracies. International Political Science Review, 39(4), 419–435.
Lisi, M. (2009). New politics in Portugal: The rise and success of the Left Bloc. Pôle Sud, 1, 127–144.
Lisi, M., Sanches, E. R., & dos Santos Maia, J. (2021). Party System Renewal or Business as Usual? Continuity and Change in Post-Bailout Portugal. South European Society and Politics,1–25.
Littrell, S, Meyers, E. A., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2022, January 19). Not all bullshit pondered is tossed: Reflection decreases receptivity to some typesof misinformation but not others. PsyArXiv Working Paper.
Littrell, Shane, Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2021a). ‘You can’t bullshit a bullshitter’ (or can you?): Bullshitting frequency predicts receptivity to various types of misleading information.British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1484–1505.
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.
Mancosu, M., Vassallo, S., & Vezzoni, C. (2017). Believing in Conspiracy Theories: Evidence from an Exploratory Analysis of Italian Survey Data. South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 327–344.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth.MIt Press.
Medina, L. (2015). Partisan supply and voters’ positioning on the left–right scale in Europe. Party Politics, 21(5), 775–790.
Mendes, M. S., & Dennison, J. (2020). Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: salience, stigma and supply. West European Politics, 1–24.
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063.
Mukerji, N. (2018). What is FakeNews? Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 5.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.
Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2019). The complex relationbetween receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit and political ideology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1440–1454.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). Estimating fact-checking’s effects. Arlington, VA: American Press Institute.
Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Schittekatte, M., & De Pauw, S. (2015). The association of cognitive ability with right–wing ideological attitudes and prejudice: A meta–analytic review. European Journal of Personality, 29(6), 599–621.
Pennycook, G.,Cheyne, J. A., Barr,N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563.
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019a). Who falls for fake news? Theroles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality.
Pennycook, G, & Rand, D. G. (2019b). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50.
Pereira, J. S. (2016). A esquerda radical no período pós-2009: nada de (muito) novo em Portugal?Oficina Do Historiador,9(1), 58–77.
Petrocelli, J. V. (2021). Politically oriented bullshit detection: Attitudinally conditional bullshitreceptivity and bullshit sensitivity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1368430220987602.
Pfattheicher, S., & Schindler, S. (2016). Misperceiving bullshit as profound is associated with favorable views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and conservatism. PloS One, 11(4), e0153419.
Robinson, R. A. H. (1996). Do CDS ao CDS-PP: o Partido do Centro Democrático Social eo seu papel na política portuguesa. Análise Social,31(138), 951–973.
Scherer, L. D., McPhetres, J., Pennycook, G., Kempe, A., Allen, L.A., Knoepke, C. E., Tate, C. E., & Matlock, D. D. (2021). Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychology.
Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255.
Sinclair, A. H., Stanley, M. L.,& Seli, P. (2020). Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1348–1361.
Spicer, A. (2020). Playing the bullshit game: How empty and misleading communication takes over organizations. Organization Theory, 1(2), 2631787720929704.
Sterling, J., Jost, J. T., & Pennycook, G. (2016). Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit? Judgment & Decision Making, 11(4).
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576.
Turpin, M. H., Walker, A., Kara-Yakoubian, M., Gabert, N. N., Fugelsang, J., & Stolz, J. A. (2019). Bullshit makes the art grow profounder. Turpin, MH, Walker, AC, Kara-Yakoubian, M., Gabert, NN, Fugelsang, JA, & Stolz, JA (2019). Bullshit makes the art grow profounder. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(6), 658-670.
Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Atkinson, M. D. (2016). What drives conspiratorial beliefs? The role of informational cues and predispositions. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 57–71.
van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020). You are fake news: political bias in perceptions of fake news. Media, Culture and Society, 42(3), 460–470.
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happensto news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies,19(13), 1866–1878.
Walker, A., Turpin, M. H., Stolz, J. A., Fugelsang, J., & Koehler, D. (2019). Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 109-119.
Copyright (c) 2022 João Pedro Baptista, Anabela Gradim, Elisete Correia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the JDMI agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0. This licensing allows others to share the work with no changes and acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but not for commercial use.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.
Additional Information
All correspondence concerning contributions, books and other review material should be sent to: deca-jdmi@ua.pt
