Playing Sites of Memory: Framing the Representation of Cultural Memory in Digital Games
Abstract
Basing on an understanding of digital games as cultural objectivations, this article suggests interpreting them as sites of memory, or in other words as ‘carrier’ of cultural memory. By merging game studies, literary studies, and memory studies, the article aims at providing an operational and theoretical toolkit useful to put different kinds of representation within (and beyond) digital games towards a broader cultural memory framework. The toolkit is inspired by Paul Ricoeur and his threefold model of textual mimesis, and favours an approach to digital games that takes into account how they represent and re- configure pre-existent cultural forms; and therefore can be refigured into novel ones during, after, and beyond the game experience.
Downloads
References
Aylett, R. (1999). Narrative in Virtual Environments -Towards Emergent Narrative. In Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium on narrative intelligence (pp. 83-86). Retrieved Dec 30, 2021 from https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Fall/1999/FS-99-01/FS99-01-014.pdf
Barton, K. M. (Ed.). (2014). Fan CULTure: Essays on participatory fandom in the 21st century. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Beverley, J. (2001). The im/possibility of politics: Subalternity, modernity, hegemony. In I. Y., Rodriguez, I. Y. (Ed.). The Latin American subaltern studies reader (pp.47-63). Durham: Duke University Press.
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation. Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Butler, J. (2004). Bodily inscriptions, performative subversions. In S., Salih & J., Butler (Eds.). The Judith Butler reader (pp.90-119). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Calafell, B. M. (2016). Monstrosity, performance, and race in contemporary culture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1719-0
Caselli, S. (2021). Counter-Strike e il counterstrike americano: giocare per ricordare la guerra al terrorismo. In L., Papale & F., Toniolo (Eds.) Valve Corporation. Videogiochi, visioni e virtuosismi di un’azienda rivoluzionaria (123-139). Milano: Biblion.
Caselli, S. & Toniolo, F. (2021). Sposare una Z23. Feticizzazione del passato e antropomorfismo moe a sfondo storico nel videogioco. Diacronie. Studi di storia contemporanea, 47(3), 127-146.
Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film, Ithaca: Cornell University press.
Cooke L., & Hubbell, G. S. (2015). Working out memory with a Medal of Honor complex. Game Studies, 15(2). Retrieved December 30,2021 from http://gamestudies.org/1502/articles/cookehubbell
Elliott, J. K. (2020, April 17). ‘Final Fantasy’ gamers hold online funeral for player who died of COVID- 19. Global News. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/6832247/coronavirus-video-game- funeral/
Erll, A. (2011). Memory in Culture. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Genette, G. (1972). Narrative discourse, Oxford: Basil Backwell.
Hall, S. (2007). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse, In Ann Gray et al. (Eds.) Colloquy of the Council of Europe Selected Working Papers, 1st ed., Ch.22, London, UK: Routdledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357071
Hammar, E. L. (2017). Counter-hegemonic commemorative play: marginalized pasts and the politics of memory in the digital game Assassin’s Creed: Freedom Cry. Rethinking History, 21(3), 372- 395.https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2016.1256622
Hammar, E. L. (2019a). Manufacturing consent in video games. The hegemonic memory politics of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain (2015). Nordlit, 42. Retrieved Dec. 30 from https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/view/5016 https://doi.org/10.7557/13.5016
Hammar, E. L. (2019b) Producing play under mnemonic hegemony: the political economy of memory production in the videogames industry. Digital Culture & Society, 5(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2019-0105
Hammar, E. L. (2020). Playing virtual Jim Crow in Mafia III - prosthetic memory via historical digital games and the limits of mass culture. Game Studies, 20(1). Retrieved Dec. 30, 2021 from http://gamestudies.org/2001/articles/hammar
Hammar, E. L., & Woodcock, J. (2020). The political economy of wargames: the production of history and memory in military video games. In H. Pötzsch (Ed.) War games. Memory, militarism and the subject of play (pp.53-71). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501351181.ch-004
Huyssen, A. (1995). Twilight memories. Marking the time in a culture of amnesia. New York, NY: Routledge.
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2003). Transmedia Storytelling: Moving Characters from Books to Films to Video Games Can Make Them Stronger and More Compelling. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved December 30, 2021 from http://www.technologyreview.com/news/401760/transmedia-storytelling/
Lachmann, R. (1993). Kultursemiotischer Prospekt. In A., Haverkamp & R., Lachmann, (Eds.) Memoria: Vergessen und Erinnern, Poetik und Hermeneutik (pp.xvii-xxvii). Munich: Fink.
Lamerichs, N. (2011). Stranger than fiction: Fan identity in cosplay. Transformative Works and Cultures, 7 (2011), https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2011.0246
McCrea, C. (2009). Gaming's hauntology: Dead media in Dead Rising, Siren and Michigan Report from Hell. In B., Perron (Ed.) Horror video games: Essays on the fusion of fear and play (pp.220- 238), Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Möring, S. (2013). The metaphor-simulation paradox in the study of computer games. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgcms.2013100103
Mukherjee, S. (2017). Videogames and postcolonialism: Empire plays back. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54822-7
Mukherjee, S. (2018). Playing subaltern: Video games and postcolonialism. Games and Culture, 13(5), 504-520.https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015627258
Neumann, B. (2008). The literary representation of memory, in A., Erll, A., Nünning & S. B., Young (Eds.) A companion to cultural memory studies: an international and interdisciplinary handbook (pp.333-343), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Nora, P. (1992). Introduction to Realms of Memory, Volume III. In L. D., Kritzman (Ed.) Realms of memory. The construction of the french past, volume iii: symbols (pp.ix-xii), New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Nora, P. (1996). From Lieux de memoire to Realms of Memory. In L. D., Kritzman (Ed.) Realms of memory. Rethinking the french past, volume i: conflicts and divisions (pp.xv-xxiv), New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Pandey, G. (1995). Voices from the edge: the struggle to write subaltern histories. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 60(3-4), 223-242.https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1995.9981519
Pötzsch, H. & Šisler, V. (2016). Playing cultural memory: Framing history in Call of Duty: Black Ops and Czechoslovakia 38-89: Assassination. Games and Culture, 14(1), 3-25.https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016638603
Rahman, O., Liu, W. S., & Cheung, B. H. M. (2012). “Cosplay”: imaginative self and performing identity. Fashion Theory - Journal of Dress Body and Culture, 16(3), 317-341. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112X13340749707204
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative. Volume I. London: The University of Chicago Press. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative. Volume 3. London: The University of Chicago Press. Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Sommer, R. (2000). Funktionsgeschichten: Überlegungen zur Verwendung des Funktionsbegriffs in der Literaturwissenschaft und Anregungen zu seiner terminologischen Differenzierung. Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch, 41, 319-41.
Šisler, V. (2016). Contested memories of war in Czechoslovakia 38-89: Assassination: designing a serious game on contemporary history. Game Studies, 16(2). Retrieved Dec. 30, 2021 from http://gamestudies.org/1602/articles/sisler
Spivak, G. C. (2010) Can the Subaltern Speak? In R. C., Morris (Ed.) Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea (pp.21-78), New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Sterczewski, P. (2020). Machine(s) of narrative security: mnemonic hegemony and polish games about violent conflicts. In H. Pötzsch (Ed.) War games. Memory, militarism and the subject of play (pp.111-135). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501351181.ch-007
Trezise, B. (2012). Touching virtual trauma: performative empathics in Second Life. Memory Studies, 5(4), 392-409.https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698011426355
Walton, K. L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Stefano Caselli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the JDMI agree to the following terms:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0. This licensing allows others to share the work with no changes and acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal, but not for commercial use.
-
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.
Additional Information
All correspondence concerning contributions, books and other review material should be sent to: deca-jdmi@ua.pt
