Re-enacting an eighteenth-century method for reinforcing musical expression
Abstract
This article demonstrates the artistic re-enactment of affective cultural practices in musical performance, with the goal of developing an increased understanding of the practices that we re-enacted, and the influence they can have on a performance. To re-enact a practice, an aesthetic mindset or conception means that they get embodied and experienced. In the research project explained here, we re-enacted the practice of evoking the music’s affections in oneself in order to arouse them in the listeners – a practice that formed a part of the eighteenth-century culture of sensibility. Through enacting the affective content of selected pieces of music, we wanted to explore how musicians and listeners interacted in a performance; the mutual influences between aesthetic mindsets and affective practices; and what difference these practices and mindsets make to the artistic effect in a musical performance. Our process included musical and emotional preparations, a video-taped re-enactment-in-performance with six participants (two players and four listeners), the writing of reflections, and analyzing them. The re-enactment highlighted how the various ways of viewing music and art in different cultures interact with how art is and was performed and experienced. The option to modify codes of performance, such as the behavior of everyone involved, the placement of people in the room, or the lighting, showed a potential to pinpoint and reflect upon aesthetic ideas about music and artistry. It opened up for choosing between ideas and conceptions we want to emphasize in a performance.
References
Coessens, K. (2019). On the sensorial of the human body in performance. In K. Coessens (Ed.), Sensorial aesthetics in music practices (pp.133–150). Leuven University Press.
Dyrssen, C. (2012). Navigating in heterogeneity: Architectural thinking and art-based research. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 223-239). Routledge.
Van Elferen, I. (2007). “Ihr Augen weint!”: Intersubjective tears in the sentimental concert hall. Understanding Bach, 2, 77–94. https://www.bachnetwork.org/ub2/vanelferen.pdf
Ellsworth, P. (1997). Levels of thought and levels of emotion. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 192–196). Oxford University Press.
Goring, P. (2005). The rhetoric of sensibility in 18th-century culture. Cambridge University Press.
Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., Thornton, P. D., & Rapson, R. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona, 8(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162
Harlow, R. (2013). Keyboard psychohaptics: A nexus of multidisciplinary research into kinesthetics, gesture, and expression. Keyboard Perspectives 6, 1–21.
Hawley, E. S. (2016). James Luna and the paradoxically present vanishing indian. Contemporaneity: Historical Presence in Visual Culture 5(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.5195/contemp.2016.170
Hosler, B. (1981). Changing aesthetic views of instrumental music in 18th-century Germany. UMI Research Press.
James, S. (1997). Passion and action: The emotions in 17th-century philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Jones, A. (2011). “The artist is present”: Artistic re-enactment and the impossibility of presence. The Drama Review 55(1), 16–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/DRAM_a_00046
Juslin, P. N. (2019). Musical emotions explained. Oxford University Press.
November, N. (2004). Theater piece and cabinetstück: Nineteenth-century visual ideologies of the string quartet. Music in Art, 29 (1/2), 134–150.
Östersjö, S. (2017). Thinking-through-music: On knowledge production, materiality, embodiment, and subjectivity in artistic research. In J. Impett (Ed.), Artistic research in music: Discipline and resistance (pp. 88–107). Leuven University Press.
Reddy, W. M. (2001). The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
Sulzer, J. G. (1774). Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste (Vol. 2). Weidmann & Reich.
Copyright (c) 2023 ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.