(Im)pertinence of the pedagogical disciplines in the courses of Physics, Mathematics and Chemistry of Higher Education: What is the perception of teachers, in activity, about this question?

Authors

  • Paulo Alexandre de Castro Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão
  • Adriana Sadoyama Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão
  • Geraldo Sadoyama Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão
  • Marcos Fernandes Sobrinho Instituto Federal Goiano – Câmpus Urutai
  • Paulo Vitor Souza Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano (IF Goiano)
  • Serigne Ababacar Cisse Ba Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão
  • Susana Sá University of Minho image/svg+xml
  • Lisete Mónico University of Coimbra image/svg+xml
  • Thays Santos Souza Universidade Federal de Goiás – Regional Catalão

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v9i3.616

Keywords:

pedagogical theories, education, exact sciences, higher education, teaching

Abstract

In this article we evaluate the perception about (im)pertinence of the formal pedagogical
knowledge of teachers of Physics, Mathematics and Chemistry of the Federal University of Goiás,
Regional Catalão (UFG / RC), Goiás-Brazil. We compare the perception of these teachers according
to their area of action training (knowledge), their pedagogical training, their degree and the time
of teaching experience. The results indicate that teachers do not perceive as relevant to have
formal knowledge of models and pedagogical conceptions, that is, they do not deem pertinent
/ necessary. Finally, we present a discussion of the factors perceived as most important for the
practice of these teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Published

2017-03-13

Issue

Section

Desenvolvimento Curricular e Didática

How to Cite

(Im)pertinence of the pedagogical disciplines in the courses of Physics, Mathematics and Chemistry of Higher Education: What is the perception of teachers, in activity, about this question?. (2017). Indagatio Didactica, 9(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v9i3.616