Specialized Content Knowledge about rational numbers: a study with Portuguese teachers from the 1st and 2nd cycles of basic education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v17i2.39276Keywords:
Specialized Knowledge of Content (SKC), Numbers and Operations, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This article presents research that analyzes the Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK) of Portuguese teachers from the 1st and 2nd Cycles of Basic Education, focusing on the topic of rational numbers. To study this dimension of mathematical knowledge for teaching, a mixed methodological approach was adopted. 61 teachers participated in the study. For data collection, a set of multiple-choice questions related to the topic of Numbers were used, originally developed by the research group at the University of Michigan (USA) within the scope of the Learning Mathematics for Teaching project, later translated and validated for the Portuguese context. Interviews were also conducted with selected teachers. The central question of the research was: How do Portuguese teachers perform in questions about rational numbers that require specialized content knowledge?
The results reveal that the participating teachers show difficulties in solving questions that require SCK. Their responses often reveal an approach based on the application of rules and procedures or on examples, to the detriment of a deeper conceptual understanding of the content involved.
Downloads
References
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466. http://doi.org/10.1086/461626
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389-407. http://doi.org.10.1177/0022487108324554
Ball, D.L., Hill, H. & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing Mathematics for Teaching. Who knows Mathematics Well Enough To Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide? American Educator, 29 (1) 14-46. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65072
Bivar, A. G., Grosso, C., Oliveira, F. e Timóteo, M. C. (2013). Caderno de Apoio ao 1.º ciclo. Ministério da Educação.
Blomeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Brocardo, J., & Carrillo, J. (2019). Ensino e aprendizagem dos números e das operações. Quadrante, 28(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.23028
Bockorni, B. R. S. & Gomes, A. (2021). A amostragem em snowball (bola de neve) em uma pesquisa qualitativa no campo da admnistração. Revista de Ciências Empresariais da UNIPAI, 22(1). http:// 10.25110/receu.v22i1.8346
Canavarro, A., Mestre, C., Gomes, D., Santos, E., Santos, L., Brunheira, L., Vicente, M., Gouveia, M. J., Correia, P., Marques, P. M., & Espadeiro, R. G. (2021). Aprendizagens Essenciais de Matemática do Ensino Básico. Direção-Geral de Educação.
Caseiro, A. & Ribeiro, C., M. (2012). Conhecimento de futuros professores dos Primeiros Anos: uma experiência com racionais. In R. Cadima, I. Pereira, H. Menino, I.S. Dias & H. Pinto (Eds). Conferência Internacional de Investigação, Práticas e Contextos em Educação, 393-400. Escola Superior de Educação e Ciências Sociais, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria. (ISBN:978-989-95554-9-5).
Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., Chin, M. J., & McGinn, D. (2020). Mathematical content knowledge and knowledge for teaching: Exploring their distinguishability and contribution to student learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(6), 579-613. http://doi.org.10.1007/s10857-019-09443-2
Cole, Y. A. (2011). Mathematical knowledge for teaching: Transferability and use in the Ghanaian context: A pilot study. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting.
Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The effects of changes in mathematical knowledge on teaching: A longitudinal study of teachers’ knowledge and instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280-330. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.3.0280
Copur-Gencturk, Y. & Tolar, T. (2022). Mathematics teaching expertise: A study of the dimensionality of content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and specif noticing skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114(5), 1-13, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103696.
Copur-Gencturk, Y., Tolar, T., Jacobson, E., & Fan,W. (2019). An empirical study of the dimensionality of the mathematical knowledge for teaching construct. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 485-497. http://doi.org. 10.1177/0022487118761860
Delaney, S. (2008). Adapting and using U. S. measures to study Irish teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.
European Commission (2018). Boosting teacher quality: pathways to effective policies. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/069297.
Gomes, A. (2003). Um estudo sobre o conhecimento matemático de (futuros) professores de 1.º ciclo. O problema dos conceitos fundamentais em Geometria. Tese de Doutoramento (não publicada), Instituto da Criança da Universidade do Minho.
Gonçalves, C. V. (2020). O conhecimento matemático de professores portugueses de matemática dos primeiros anos. Tese de Doutoramento (não publicada). Instituto de Educação da Universidade do Minho.
Hanna, G. (2014). The width of a proof. PNA, 9 (1), 29-39.
Haycock, K. (2006). Improving achievement and closing gaps, Pre-K through college. http://www2.edtrust.org/EdTrust/ Product+Catalog/recent+presentations.
Hiebert, J. &. Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: an introductory analysis. In: J. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of Mathematics, 1-27. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. http://doi.org. 10.3102/00028312042002371.
Hill, H. C., Schilling S. G. & Ball, D. L.(2004). Developing Measures of Teachers’ Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching. The Elementary Journal, 105 (1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1086/428763.
Kwon, M. (2009). Validating the adapted mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) measures in Korea. Paper presented at the AERA 2009 Annual Meeting.
Li, Y., & Kaiser, G. (Eds.). (2011). Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective. http://doi.10.1007/978-1-4419-7707-6
Ma, L. (1999). Saber e Ensinar Matemática Elementar. Gradiva.
Mariotti, M. A. (2006). Proof and proving in mathematics education. In A. B. Gutiérrez, Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: past, present and future, pp. 173-204. Ed. Sende Publishers.http. doi.10.1163/9789087901127_008
Martins, C. M., & Branco, N. (2018). Interpretação por futuros professores de educação básica de estratégias de resolução de tarefas envolvendo números racionais. Atas XXIX SIEM, 125-128.
Ministério da Educação. (2013). Programa e Metas Curriculares Matemática do Ensino Básico. Ministério da Educação.
Mosvold, R., Fauskanger, J, Jakobsen, A. & Melhus, K. F. (2009). Translating test items into Norwegian - without getting lost in translation? Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 14 (4), 9-31. http://doi.org.10.7146/nomad.v14i4.148213
Ng, D. (2011). Using the MKT measures to reveal Indonesian teachers’ mathematical knowledge: challenges and potentials. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 1–13. http://doi.org.10.1007/s11858-011-0375-9.
Pinto, H. e Ribeiro, C. M. (2013). Conhecimento e formação de futuros professores dos primeiros anos – o sentido de número racional. Da Investigação às Práticas, 3 (1), 80-98.
Ribeiro, C. M. (2009). Conhecimento Matemático para Ensinar: uma experiência de formação de professores no caso da multiplicação de decimais. Bolema, 34, 1-26.
Ribeiro, C. M. (2011). Conhecimento e desenvolvimento profissional do professor. Analisando a prática de Maria, uma professora do 1.º Ciclo. Indagatio Didactica, 3(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v3i1.4556
Sanders, W.L., & Rivers, J.C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Research Progress Report. University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
Scheiner, T., Buchhiltz, N. & Kaiserm G. (2023). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and mathematics didatic knowledge: a comparative study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27, 1083-1104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09598-z .
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1175860.
Silva, L. T. S., Santos, T. de F. O., Almeida , R. N., & Amorim, M. (2021). Conhecimentos Evidenciados Por Futuras Professoras de Matemática Sobre os Números Racionais e Sobre seu Ensino. Jornal Internacional De Estudos Em Educação Matemática, 14(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.17921/2176-5634.2021v14n2p173-180
Sitabkhan, Y., Alikova, A., Toktogulova, N., Zholdoshbekova, A., Ralaingita, W., & Stern, J. (2024). Understanding Primary School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. RTI Press. https://doi .org/10.3768/rtipress.2024.rr.0052.2409
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (671-701). Sage Publications.
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): conceptual framework. Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors keep the copyright for their work, assigning the first publication rights to the journal.
The Journal Indagatio Didactica is under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Model copyright statement to be submitted when the article is accepted for publication:
Copyright Statement PT | Copyright Statement EN







