A integração curricular da Wikipédia no contexto formativo do Designer Educacional: caso focalizado numa ação de extensão

Teresa Margarida Loureiro Cardoso; Filomena Pestana; Luciano Gamez

doi:10.34624/id.v16i2.36019

Authors

Teresa Margarida Loureiro Cardoso LE@D, Laboratório de Educação a Distância e Elearning https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-2358 (unauthenticated)
Filomena Pestana LE@D, Laboratório de Educação a Distância e Elearning, Universidade Aberta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3146-8792 (unauthenticated)
Luciano Gamez Universidade Federal de São Paulo; Universidade Aberta do Brasil; Rede WEIWER®, LE@D, Universidade Aberta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-668X (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v16i2.36019

Keywords:

Networked Educational Technologies, Open Education, Wikipedia, Higher Education, Extension Training Action

Abstract

Our aim is to present an experience of curricular integration of Wikipedia in the educational designer’s training context, based on a proposal that involved designing didactic choreographies in the Higher Technology Course in Educational Design at the Federal University of São Paulo (Unifesp). The training proposal was also associated with the organization of an extension event titled “Wikipedia in the Curriculum: Utopia or Reality?”. We start by describing our theoretical framework, related to Open Education, which includes the International Academic Network WEIWER®, and within it, Wikipedia. Then, we consider our methodological framework, based on a case study from the perspective of the pragmatic paradigm, using data collection instruments, which are also described. Subsequently, the training context in which the extension event was integrated is discussed, as well as the results of this activity, based on data collected from two surveys conducted through questionnaires and participant observation using a focused observation grid. The statistical and content analysis of the evidence points to the finding that there is still a significant lack of knowledge on how to effectively integrate Wikipedia into the curriculum. This reveals the need to provide relevant information within the academic environment to inspire new actors, both teachers and students, to recognize the scientific potential of the current encyclopedia as a tool allied with the design of new didactic choreographies in several educational, open, and networked contexts, thereby founding new pedagogical paths and the curricular integration of Wikipedia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, N. (2008). The Charms of Wikipedia. New York Review Books. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2008/03/20/the-charms-of-wikipedia/

Ball, C. (2019). WikiLiteracy: Enhancing students’ digital literacy with Wikipedia. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(2), 253-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/13.2.2669

Bruckman, A. (2022). Should you Believe Wikipedia? Online Communities and the Construction of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

Cardoso, T. & Pestana, F. (2023). Wikipedia and MediaWiki: Two Key Elements of a Wikipedogagy Practice. M. Rodrigues; M. Figueiredo & J. Torres (Edits). Atas do XXV Simpósio Internacional de Informática Educativa, pp. 124-128. Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal.

Cardoso, T., & Pestana, F. (2020). A Wikipédia como prática e recurso educacional aberto na formação docente. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 13(32), 2020: 1-16. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/10196

Cardoso, T., & Pestana, F. (2021). Wikipédia, uma Ferramenta de Inclusão Digital? In João Mattar (Org.). Relatos de pesquisas em tecnologia educacional, 147-157. Artesanato Educacional. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/10915

Cardoso, T., Gamez, L., & Pestana, F. (2022). A Rede Académica WEIWER® e Coreografias Didáticas: que relação? In J. Rodrigues e M. A. Marques (Orgs.) Ciências Socialmente Aplicáveis: Integrando Saberes e Abrindo Caminhos, Volume V, Capítulo 4, pp. 48-60. Editora ARTEMIS.

Cardoso, T., Pestana, F., & Pinto, J. (2019). Rede académica WEIWER: a Wikipédia como objeto de estudo? PRISMA.COM, 40, 107-117. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/8950

Conole, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Reflecting on the impact of the Open Education Movement. Journal of learning for Development, 5(3), 187-203.

Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127-143.

Cummings, R. (2009). Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia. Vanderbilt University Press.

Cummings, R. (2023). Post-pandemic digital writing instruction will be Resilient, Open, and Inclusive. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.11

Davis, L. (2018). Wikipedia and Education: a Natural Collaboration, Supported by Libraries. M. Proffitt (Edit.) Levering Wikipedia: Connecting Comunities of Knowledge, pp. 87-118. American Library Association Editions.

English, C. (2023). Understanding Rural Communities: Crafting Local Inquiries as Praxis for Pre-Service ELA Students in Teaching Composition. The Rural Educator, 44(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.55533/ 2643-9662.1311

Estrela, A. (1994). Teoria e Prática de Observação de Classes. Uma Estratégia de Formação de Professores. Porto Editora.

Freixo, M. (2011). Metodologia Científica Fundamentos Métodos e Técnicas. Instituto Piaget.

Gamez, L. (2020). Aprendizagem aberta e em rede em Design Educacional: meta-análise de referenciais no TEDE /UNIFESP e na Wikipédia. Universidade Aberta (Portugal). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/10214

Gamez, L., & Trindade, R. (2019). O desenho de coreografias didáticas no contexto do Paradigma Pedagógico da Comunicação: Reflexões a partir da observação de pares multidisciplinar. In: C. Leite, P. Fernandes. Currículo, Avaliação, Formação e Tecnologias educativas (CAFTe): contributos teóricos e práticos. II Seminário Internacional, 556-567. Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas (CIIE) da Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação (FPCE) da Universidade do Porto.

Gamez, L.; Cardoso, T. & Pestana, F. (2023). Rede WEIWER® e Coreografias Didaticas: O Exemplo dos “Produtos de Aprendizagem”. In T. Cardoso (Edit.). Educação: saberes em movimento, saberes que movimentam, VII vol., Capítulo 3, pp. 23-35. Editora Artemis.

Hadjerrouit, S. (2012). Pedagogical Criteria for Successful Use of Wikis as Collaborative Writing Tools in Teacher Education. 3rd International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning IPEDR. IACSIT Press.

Halfaker, A., Geiger, R. S., Morgan, J. T., & Riedl, J. (2013). The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 664-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469365

Jemielniak, D. (2014). Common Knowledge? na Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University Press.

Kennedy, K. (2016). Textual Curation: Authorship, Agency, and Technology in Wikipedia and Chamber’s Cyclopaedia. The University of South Carolina Press.

Knight, C. & Pryke, S. (2012). Wikipedia and the University, a case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 649-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.666734

Lih, A. (2009). The Wikipedia Revolution. How a bunch of nobodies created the world’s greatest encyclopedia. Aurum Press.

Lih, A. (2018). What Are Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums (GLAM) to the Wikimedia Community? M. Proffitt (Edit.) Levering Wikipedia: Connecting Comunities of Knowledge, pp. 7-16. American Library Association Editions.

Lockett, A. (2020). The Politics of User Agency and Participation on Wikipedia. J. Reagle & J. Koerner (Org.) Wikipedia @20 Stories of an Incomplete Revolution. MIT Press.

McKenzie, B. (2023). Dungeons and dragons and digital writing: A case study of worldbuilding. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.10

Oser, F. K. & Baeriswyl, F. J. (2001). Choreographies of Teaching: Bridging Instruction to Learning”, In V. Richardson (Edit.): Handbook of Research on Teaching, Fourth Edition, pp.1031-1065. American Educational Research Association.

Park, D. E., & Bridges, L. M. (2022). Meet Students Where They Are: Centering Wikipedia in the Classroom. Communications in Information Literacy, 16 (1), 4-23.

Pestana, F. (2014). A Wikipédia como recurso educacional aberto: conceções e práticas de estudantes e professores no ensino superior online. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Aberta (Portugal). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/3370

Pestana, F. (2018). A Wikipédia como recurso educacional aberto: um contributo para o Programa Wikipédia na Universidade. Tese de Doutoramento. Universidade Aberta (Portugal). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/7372

Pestana, F., & Cardoso, T. (2020). Meta-análise da página lusófona do Programa Wikipédia na Universidade: proposta de sistema metodológico a partir de MAECC®. Indagatio Didactica, 12(3), 245-264. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/9986

Reagle, J. M. (2010). Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. The MIT Press.

Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, B. & Hussein, S. (2023), Essaying the design, development and validation processes of a new digital literacy scale. Online Information Review, 47(2), pp. 371-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2021-0532

Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital Literacy: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 11(2), 65-94.

Reis, P. (2011). Observação de Aulas e Avaliação do Desempenho Docente. Ministério da Educação – Conselho Científico para a Avaliação.

Tkacz, N. (2015). Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. The University of Chicago Press.

Trindade, V. (2007). Práticas de Formação – Métodos e Técnicas de Observação e Avaliação (em Supervisão). Universidade Aberta.

Zabalza, M. (2016). Ser profesor universitario hoy. La Cuestión Universitaria, 0(5), 68-80. https://polired.upm.es/index.php/lacuestionuniversitaria/article/view/3338

Zabalza, M. A. (2013). Innovación en la enseñanza universitaria. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación, (6), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.531