Cooperative cataloging in the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul: analysis of the technological transition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34624/etd.v0i5.25299Keywords:
cataloguing, cooperative cataloguing, technological transition, ociotechnical system, context analysis, PergamumAbstract
It presents the cataloging services developed at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul; addresses how the implementation and subsequent exchange and updating of collection automation systems directly impacted the cataloging practices of the libraries of this Brazilian University. It briefly describes how the transitions occurred in this socio-technical system, which involves the interaction and adaptation of its work practices from the introduction of technological tools. For this, through a sociotechnical approach, based on the analysis of the contexts of sociotechnical phenomena, the influence that collection automation software had on the alteration, transition and transformation of the socio-technical system experienced by the authors is presented. This type of analysis enabled a holistic view of the current context of the analysis socio-technical system, so that it was possible to describe, albeit objectively, the various contexts experienced and the protocols adopted to deal with the necessary and intended situations and developments, mainly with direct relation to the cataloging and information organization processes. It is observed that the transition from a centralized to a decentralized context, promoted mainly by the evolution of a technological tool, motivated and encouraged the change of professional practices and routines, such as the development of a collaborative culture.
References
BARDRAM, J. (1998). Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities. DAIMI Report Series, 27(536). https://doi.org/10.7146/dpb.v27i536.7066
BRASIL (2007). Ministério da Educação. Decreto no 6.096 de 24 de abril de 2007. Institui o Programa de Apoio a Planos de Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais – REUNI. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, Seção 1, p. 7.
CUNHA, M. B. (2010). A biblioteca universitária na encruzilhada. DataGramaZero, Revista de Ciência da Informação, 11 (6). http://www.datagramazero.org.br/dez10/Art_07.htm
FOSKETT, A. C. (1972). A study of the role of categories in a thesaurus for education documentation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
FUFMS (2008). Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Contrato de prestação de serviço e licença de uso de software no 184/2007-UFMS. Boletim de Serviço, Campo Grande, MS, 20 (4231), 8 jan., p. 23.
GARCIA, R. M. (1980). Abordagem sócio-técnica: uma rápida avaliação. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 20(3), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75901980000300006
GEELS, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
GREGOR, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
LANCASTER, F. W. (1972). Vocabulary control for information retrieval. Information Resources Press, Washington.
LEE, A. (2001). Editor's Comments. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), iii-vii. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3250954
MEY, E. S. A. (1995). Introdução a catalogação. Brasília, DF: Lemos Informação e Comunicação.
MEY, E. S. A.; SILVEIRA, N.C. (2009). Catalogação no plural. Brasília, DF: Briquet de Lemos.
OCLC (2002). OCLC RetroCon Batch service planning guide. https://library.oclc.org/digital/collection/p15003coll74/id/103/
PERGAMUM (2019). http://www.pergamum.pucpr.br
ROQUE, L. G. (2004). Contribuição para uma Engenharia do Contexto (Tese de Doutoramento). Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/1743
ROWLEY, J. (2002). A biblioteca eletrônica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos.
SANTA ANNA, J.; CALMON, M. A.; CAMPOS, S. (2016). Representação documentária em diferentes bibliotecas: o tratamento informacional como um processo plural. Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia em Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 21(1), p. 61-75. http://revista.acbsc.org.br/racb/article/view/1151/pdf
SERRA, L. G. (2013). O formato MARC e o RDA: tempos de mudanças? In: IX Encontro Internacional de Catalogadores e II Encontro Nacional de Catalogadores, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
TENNANT, R. (2002). MARC exit strategies. Library Journal, New York, p.26-27. http://www.slisweb.lis.wisc.edu/dshapiro/tennant2.html
UFMS (2020). Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul: histórico. https://www.ufms.br/universidade/historico/
UNESCO (2017). Communication and information: CDS/ISIS database software. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/information-society/open-source-and-low-cost-technologies/information-processing-tools/cdsisis-database-software/
WELSH, A. & BATLEY, S. (2012). Practical cataloguing: AACR2, RDA and MARC 21. Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
