Caracteres Cómicos: Menandro e Teofrasto

Resumo

Menander and Theophrastus offered an insight into contemporary 4th BC Greek society and illustrated comic figures who deviated from accepted standards of behavior through their oeuvres. This article will attempt to reevaluate their relationship and focus on the similarities and the differences between Menander’s comic characters through his most complete plays and Theophrastus’ Characters. While Theophrastus meticulously examines his characters according to their external vicious traits, he shares little interest from deeper motives. On the other hand, Menander seems to combine both external features and inner motives, in order to depict his character’s deviant dispositions. Therefore, I examine the way specific comic characters are portrayed by means of key words/phrases that occur in both Menander’s and Theophrastus’ texts. Thus, I will bring the two authors together, in order to find resemblances between their character-types and show more clearly ho  they choose to study unrefined types, in a humorous and ethical perspective.

Referências

Anderson, M. (1970). Knemon’s “Hamartia.” Greece & Rome, 17(2), 199-217. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/642764.

Arnott, W. G. (ed. and trans.) (2000). Menander Samia. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Arnott, W. G. (ed. and trans.) (1997). Menander Perikeiromene. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Arnott, W. G. (1995). Further Notes on Menander’s Perikeiromene. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 109, 11-30. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20189623.

Arnott, W. G. (ed. and trans.) (1979). Menander Dyskolos. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Arnott, W. G. (ed. and trans.) (1979). Menander Epitrepontes. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Arnott, W. G. (1964). The Confrontation of Sostratos and Gorgias. Phoenix, 18(2), 110-123. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1085913.

Brown, P. G. McC. (1992). The Construction of Menander’s Dyskolos, Acts I-IV. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 94, 8-20. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20188776.

Cinaglia, V. (2012). Aristotle and Menander on How People Go Wrong. The Classical Quarterly 62(2), 553-566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983881200016X.

Cox, C. A. (2002). Is Sostratus’ Family Urban in Menander’s “Dyskolos”? The Classical Journal, 97(4), 351-358. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3298449.

Cox, C. A. (2002). Crossing Boundaries through Marriage in Menander’s “Dyskolos.” The Classical Quarterly, 52(1), 391-394. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3556470

Diggle, J. (2004). Characters/Theophrastus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flórez Restrepo, J. A. (2006). La Comedia de Menandro, una comedia ética. Discusiones Filosóficas 7(10), 199-214. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-61272006000100012.

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1974). Menander’s “Perikeiromene”: Misfortune, Vehemence, and Polemon.

Phoenix, 28(4), 430-443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1087547.

Furley, W. (2015). The Text and Staging of the Recognition scene in Menander’s “Perikeiromene.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, 129, 31-43. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44216724.

Furley, W. (2013). Pamphile Regains Her Voice: on the Newly Published Fragments of Menander’s

Epitrepontes. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 185, 82-90. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23849780

Furley, W. D. (2009). Menander Epitrepontes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study.

Gomme, A.W., Sandbach, F. H. (1973). Menander: A Commentary. London: Oxford University Press.

Grant, J. N. (1986). The Father-Son Relationship and the Ending of Menander’s “Samia.” Phoenix, 40(2), 172-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1088510.

Groton, A. H. (1987). Anger in Menander’s Samia. The American Journal of Philology, 108(3), 437-443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/294666.

Haegemans. (2001). Character Drawing in Menander’s Dyskolos: Misanthropy And Philanthropy. Mnemosyne, 54(6), 675-696. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685250152952149.

Hicks, E. L. (1882). On the Characters of Theophrastus. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 3, 128-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/623532.

Hicks, R.D. (trans.) (1925). Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Iversen, P. A. (2001). Coal for Diamonds: Syriskos’ Character in Menander’s “Epitrepontes. ”The American Journal of Philology, 122(3), 381-403. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1562034.

Keuls, E. (1973). The Samia of Menander. An Interpretation of Its Plot and Theme. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 10, 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20180442.

Kiritsi, S. (2017). Menandean characters in context: Menander’s characters in the fourth century BC and their reception in modern Greek theatre. London: Ph.D. diss. Royal Holloway. Available upon request from the Royal Holloway.

Konstan, D. (2013). Menander’s slaves: the banality of violence. In B. Akrigg & R. Tordoff (Eds.), Slaves and Slavery in Ancient Greek Comic Drama (pp. 144-158). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Konstan, D. (1995). Greek comedy and ideology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Konstan, D. (1987). Between Courtesan and Wife: Menander’s “Perikeiromene.” Phoenix, 41(2), 122-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1088740.

Lloyd-Jones, H. (1974). Notes on Menander’s Perikeiromene. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 15, 209-213. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20180751.

McCabe, R. A. (1995). Refining Theophrastus: Ethical Concerns and Moral Paragons in the English Character Book. Hermathena, 159, 33-50. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23041079

McCabe, R. A. (1989). Ben Jonson, Theophrastus, and the Comedy of Humours. Hermathena, 146, 25-37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23041093.

MacCary, W. T. (1972). Menander’s Soldiers: Their Names, Roles, and Masks. The American Journal of Philology, 93(2), 279-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/293252.

MacCary, W. T. (1971). Menander’s Old Men. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 102, 303-325. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2935946.

MacCary, W. T. (1970). Menander’s Characters: Their Names, Roles and Masks. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 101, 277-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2936054.

Millett, P. (2007). Theophrastus and his world. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society. Post, L. A. (1960). Virtue Promoted in Menander’s Dyscolus. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 91, 152-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/283851.

Proceedings of the London Classical Society. (1973). Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 20, 158-165. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43646318.

Römer, C. (2015). News from Smikrines and Pamphile Two New Fragments of “Epitrepontes” 786-803 and 812-820 Sandbach-Furley. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 196, 49-54. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43909936.

Rosivach, V. J. (2001). Class Matters in the “Dyskolos” of Menander. The Classical Quarterly, 51(1), 127-134. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3556334.

Rusten, J. C., Cunnighman, I.C. (ed. and trans.) (2014). Theophrastus Characters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sommerstein, A. H. (2014). Menander in contexts. New York: Routledge.

Traill, A. (2008). Women and the Comic Plot in Menander. Cambridge: University Press.

Traill, A. (2001). Perikeiromene 486-510: The Legality of Polemon’s Self-help Remedy. Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada 45(3), 279-294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/mou.2001.0009.

Tzifopoulos, Y. Z. (1995). Proverbs in Menander’s “Dyskolos”: The Rhetoric of Popular Wisdom. Mnemosyne, 48(2), 169-177. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4432476.

Ussher, R. (1977). Old Comedy and ‘Character’: Some Comments. Greece & Rome 24 (1), 71-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500019641.

Ussher, R. (1960). The characters of Theophrastus. London: Macmillan.

Vellacott, P. (1973). The characters by Theophrastus and Plays and fragments by Menander. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Zagagi, N. (1979). Sostratos as a Comic, Over-Active and Impatient Lover: On Menander’s Dramatic Art in His Play Dyskolos. Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik, 36, 39-48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20185761.

Publicado
2024-10-31