La utilitas de la poesía en la retórica epicúrea. Fundamentos filosóficos de los beneficios de su sonoridad según Lucrecio
Abstract
We discuss if the acknowledgement of the utility (utilitas) of poetry by Lucretius may be considered as an amplifying development of Epicurean rhetoric, a possibility yet to be investigated by current research trends. On the one hand, this task will consist in showing how Lucretius's proposal complies with the broad understanding of the act of persuasion and persuasive means, as outlined in extant Epicurean rhetoric. On the other, it will consist in establishing the compatibility between such proposal and the developments of Epicuren atomology and gnoseology.
References
ALBORNOZ, V. (2006), “Sonitu et sensu - Un análisis del sonido como creador de efecto de sentido en Lucrecio, De rerum natura, 5. 925-1027”: Praesentia 7 (2016) 1-16.
ALBRECHT, M.; SCHMELING, G. (1997), A history of Roman literature - From Livius Andronicus to Boethius: with special regard to its influence on world literature. Leiden, E.J. Brill.
ASMIS, E. (1983), “Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius”: The American Journal of Philology 104, 1 (1983) 36-66.
BAILEY, C. (1926), Epicurus - The Extant Remains. Oxford, The Clarendon press.
BARTALUCCI, A. (1972), “Lucrezio e la retorica”: Studi classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella. Catania, Università di Catania, Facoltà di lettere e filosofía, 45–83.
BRAICOVICH, R. (2017), “Racionalismo y retórica en Filodemo de Gádara”: Diánoia 62, 79, (2017) 141-164.
CALBOLI, G. (2003), “Lucrezio e la retorica”: Paideia 58 (2003) 187-206.
CLASSEN, C. (1968), “Poetry and Rhetoric in Lucretius”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 99 (1968) 77-118.
CLAY, D., (1995), “Framing the Margins of Philodemus and Poetry”: OBBINK, D. (Ed.) (1995), Philodemus and poetry: poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. New York, Oxford University Press.
EDGEWORTH-BUTLER, H. (1920), Quintilian - Institutio oratoria. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
ERNOUT, A.; ROBIN, L. (1962), Lucrèce - De rerum natura: commentaire exégétique et critique, précédé d'une introduction sur l 'art de Lucrèce et d 'une traduction des lettres et pensées d 'Épicure, 2º edición. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
GARANI, M. (2012), Empedocles redivivus - Poetry and analogy in Lucretius. London, Routledge.
GLIDDEN, D. (1979), “Sensus and sense perception in the De rerum natura”: California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 12 (1979) 155-181.
GODWIN, J. (1992), Lucretius - De rerum natura IV. Warminister, Wiltshire, Aris & Phillips Ltd.
HICKS, R. (1925), Diogenes Laertius - Lives of the eminent philosophers. New York: Putnam ́& sons.
IRVINE, J. (1971), “The “rhetorica” of Philodemus”: Western Speech 35, 2 (1971) 96-103.
KENNEY, E. (2007), “Lucretian texture: style, metre and rhetoric in the De rerum natura”: GILLESPIE, S., HARDIE, P. (Comp.) (2007), The Cambridge companion to Lucretius. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 92-110.
KILPATRICK, R. (1996), “Amicus Medicus: Medicine and Epicurean Therapy in De Rerum Natura”: Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 41 (1996) 69-100.
KOENEN, M. (1999), “Lucretius' Explanation of Hearing in ‘De Rerum Natura’ IV 524-562”: Mnemosyne 52, 4 (1999) 434-463.
LATHIERE, A. (1972), “Lucrece Traducteur d'Epicure - animus, anima dans les Livres 3 et 4 du De Rerum Natura”: Phoenix 26,2 (1972) 123-133.
LENAGHAN, L. (1967), "Lucretius 1.921-50": Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 98 (1967) 221-51.
LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ, M., SABATER-BELTRÁ, A. (2017), “La villa de los papiros de Herculano en el siglo XXI: actualización científica y estado de la cuestión 2000-2016”: Revista Hélade 3 (2017) 205-227.
MARKOVIĆ, D. (2008), The rhetoric of explanation in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Leiden-Boston, Brill.
MATTOS, R. (2019), “El potencial persuasivo de los montajes poético-imaginarios: una consideración retórico-lucreciana”: Revista de estudios clásicos 46 (2019) 97-118.
MILANESE, G. (1989), Lucida carmina: comunicazione e scrittura da Epicuro a Lucrezio. Milán, Vita e pensiero.
MUNRO, H. [1864] (2009), Titi Lucreti Cari - De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
PLASBERG, O. (1917), M. Tulli Ciceronis - De natura deorum. Lipsiae, Teubner.
SCHIESARO, A. (1987), “Lucrezio, Cicerone, l'oratoria”: Materiali E Discussioni per L'analisi Dei Testi Classici 19 (1987) 29-61.
SETAIOLI, A. (2005), “L'analogie et la similitude comme instruments de démonstration chez Lucrèce”: Pallas 69 (2005) 117-141.
SUDHAUS, S. (1892-1896), Philodemi volumina rhetorica - Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Lipsiae, In aedibus B.G. Teubneri.
USENER, H. [1887] (2010), Epicurea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
VALENTI FIOL, E. [1976] (2012), Lucrecio, De rerum natura, De la naturaleza. Barcelona, Acantilado.
VOLK, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic, Lucretius, Virgil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
WALLACH, B. (1975), Lucretius and the Diatribe - De Rerum Natura II. Leiden, E.J. Brill.
WILKINS, A. (1902–1903). M. Tulli Ciceronis - Rhetorica. Oxonii, E typographeo Clarendoniano.
ALBRECHT, M.; SCHMELING, G. (1997), A history of Roman literature - From Livius Andronicus to Boethius: with special regard to its influence on world literature. Leiden, E.J. Brill.
ASMIS, E. (1983), “Rhetoric and Reason in Lucretius”: The American Journal of Philology 104, 1 (1983) 36-66.
BAILEY, C. (1926), Epicurus - The Extant Remains. Oxford, The Clarendon press.
BARTALUCCI, A. (1972), “Lucrezio e la retorica”: Studi classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella. Catania, Università di Catania, Facoltà di lettere e filosofía, 45–83.
BRAICOVICH, R. (2017), “Racionalismo y retórica en Filodemo de Gádara”: Diánoia 62, 79, (2017) 141-164.
CALBOLI, G. (2003), “Lucrezio e la retorica”: Paideia 58 (2003) 187-206.
CLASSEN, C. (1968), “Poetry and Rhetoric in Lucretius”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 99 (1968) 77-118.
CLAY, D., (1995), “Framing the Margins of Philodemus and Poetry”: OBBINK, D. (Ed.) (1995), Philodemus and poetry: poetic theory and practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. New York, Oxford University Press.
EDGEWORTH-BUTLER, H. (1920), Quintilian - Institutio oratoria. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
ERNOUT, A.; ROBIN, L. (1962), Lucrèce - De rerum natura: commentaire exégétique et critique, précédé d'une introduction sur l 'art de Lucrèce et d 'une traduction des lettres et pensées d 'Épicure, 2º edición. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
GARANI, M. (2012), Empedocles redivivus - Poetry and analogy in Lucretius. London, Routledge.
GLIDDEN, D. (1979), “Sensus and sense perception in the De rerum natura”: California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 12 (1979) 155-181.
GODWIN, J. (1992), Lucretius - De rerum natura IV. Warminister, Wiltshire, Aris & Phillips Ltd.
HICKS, R. (1925), Diogenes Laertius - Lives of the eminent philosophers. New York: Putnam ́& sons.
IRVINE, J. (1971), “The “rhetorica” of Philodemus”: Western Speech 35, 2 (1971) 96-103.
KENNEY, E. (2007), “Lucretian texture: style, metre and rhetoric in the De rerum natura”: GILLESPIE, S., HARDIE, P. (Comp.) (2007), The Cambridge companion to Lucretius. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 92-110.
KILPATRICK, R. (1996), “Amicus Medicus: Medicine and Epicurean Therapy in De Rerum Natura”: Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 41 (1996) 69-100.
KOENEN, M. (1999), “Lucretius' Explanation of Hearing in ‘De Rerum Natura’ IV 524-562”: Mnemosyne 52, 4 (1999) 434-463.
LATHIERE, A. (1972), “Lucrece Traducteur d'Epicure - animus, anima dans les Livres 3 et 4 du De Rerum Natura”: Phoenix 26,2 (1972) 123-133.
LENAGHAN, L. (1967), "Lucretius 1.921-50": Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 98 (1967) 221-51.
LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ, M., SABATER-BELTRÁ, A. (2017), “La villa de los papiros de Herculano en el siglo XXI: actualización científica y estado de la cuestión 2000-2016”: Revista Hélade 3 (2017) 205-227.
MARKOVIĆ, D. (2008), The rhetoric of explanation in Lucretius' De rerum natura. Leiden-Boston, Brill.
MATTOS, R. (2019), “El potencial persuasivo de los montajes poético-imaginarios: una consideración retórico-lucreciana”: Revista de estudios clásicos 46 (2019) 97-118.
MILANESE, G. (1989), Lucida carmina: comunicazione e scrittura da Epicuro a Lucrezio. Milán, Vita e pensiero.
MUNRO, H. [1864] (2009), Titi Lucreti Cari - De Rerum Natura Libri Sex. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
PLASBERG, O. (1917), M. Tulli Ciceronis - De natura deorum. Lipsiae, Teubner.
SCHIESARO, A. (1987), “Lucrezio, Cicerone, l'oratoria”: Materiali E Discussioni per L'analisi Dei Testi Classici 19 (1987) 29-61.
SETAIOLI, A. (2005), “L'analogie et la similitude comme instruments de démonstration chez Lucrèce”: Pallas 69 (2005) 117-141.
SUDHAUS, S. (1892-1896), Philodemi volumina rhetorica - Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana. Lipsiae, In aedibus B.G. Teubneri.
USENER, H. [1887] (2010), Epicurea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
VALENTI FIOL, E. [1976] (2012), Lucrecio, De rerum natura, De la naturaleza. Barcelona, Acantilado.
VOLK, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic, Lucretius, Virgil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
WALLACH, B. (1975), Lucretius and the Diatribe - De Rerum Natura II. Leiden, E.J. Brill.
WILKINS, A. (1902–1903). M. Tulli Ciceronis - Rhetorica. Oxonii, E typographeo Clarendoniano.
Published
2022-03-22
Section
Articles
