Eurípides: una inversión
Palavras-chave:
pólis;, mulheres;, igualdade;, comunidade;
Resumo
O artigo pretende elucidar a relação entre o projeto “político” grego e as figuras femininas nas tragédias de Eurípedes, especialmente Alceste e Medeia. Conclui-se que as razões pelas quais as mulheres são excluídas do projeto político masculino são as mesmas que as tornam vozes protagonistas uma vez consolidado o projeto.
Referências
ALLEN, D. (2005), “Greek Tragedy and Law”: M. GAGARIN (2005), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 374-393.
ASPER, M. (2005), “Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason”: AION. Annali dell' Università degli Studi di Napoli 'L'Orientale' 26 (2005) 74-94.
CAIRNS, D. (2014), “Euripides’ Medea: Feminism or Misogyny?”: D. Stuttard (2014), Looking at Medea. Essays and a Translation of Euripides’ Tragedy. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 123-137.
CHESTERTON, G. K. (2010), Chaucer. Sevilla, Renacimiento.
CONACHER, D. J. (1984), “Structural Aspects of Euripides’ Alcestis”: D. GERBER (1984), Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, Calif., Scholars Press, 73-81.
DALE, A. M. (1978), Alcestis. Edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DELLNER, J. J. (2000), “Alcestis’ Double Life”: The Classical Journal 96.1 (2000) 1-25.
DIGGLE, J. (1984), Euripidis Fabulae. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.
ETXABE, J. (2009), “Antigone’s Nomos”: Animus. The Canada Journal of Philosophy and Humanities 13 (2009) 60-73.
FINLEY, M. I. (1980), “Aristóteles y el análisis económico”: M. I. FINLEY (1980), Vieja y nueva democracia. Barcelona, Ariel, 169-206.
FLORY, S. (1978), “Medea’s Right Hand: Promises and Revenge”: Transactions of the American Philological Association 108 (1978) 69-74.
GIOMBINI, S. (2018), “The Law in Euripides’ Medea”: Revista Archai 22 (2018) 219-228.
GREGORY, J. (1979), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Hermes 107.3 (1979) 259-270.
GRIFFITH, M. (1999), Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HARRIES, E. M. (2006), “Antigone The Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos”: E. M. HARRIES (2006), Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 41-80.
HARTOUNI, V. (1983), “Antigone’s Dilemma: A Problem in Political Membership”: Hypatia 1.1 (1983) 3-20.
LLOYD, M. (1985), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Greece & Rome 32 (1985) 119-131.
MCCLURE, L. (2017), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester, Wiley, Blackwell.
MASTRONARDE, D. J. (2002), Euripides. Medea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MEIKLE, S. (2000), “Quality and Quantity: The Metaphysical Construction of the Economic Realm”: New Literary History 31.2 (2000) 247-268.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2016), Mortal y fúnebre. Leer la Ilíada. Madrid, Dioptrías.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2019), El llanto y la pólis. Madrid, La Oficina de Arte y Ediciones.
MORRIS, I. (1989), “Attitudes Toward Death in Archaic Greece”: Classical Antiquity 8.2 (1989) 296-320.
MULGAN, R. (1999), “The Role of Friendship in Aristotle’s Political Theory”: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2.4 (1999) 15-32.
MUNTEANU, D. L. (2020), “Women’s Voices in Euripides”: A. MARKANTONATOS (2020), Brills’ Companion to Euripides. Vol. 1. Leiden, Brill, 889-910.
MURNAGHAN, S. (1999), “The Survivor’s Song: The Drama of Mourning in Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’”: Illinois Classical Studies 24/25 (1999) 107-116.
NANCY, C. (1984), “Euripides et la partie de femmes”: Quaderni Urbinati Di Cultura Classica 17.2 (1984) 111-136.
PODLECKI, A. J. (1966), “Creon and Herodotus”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97 (1966) 359-371.
REINHARDT, K. (1968), “Die Sinneskrise bei Euripides”: E. SCHWINGE (1968), Euripides. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 507-542.
ROSIVACH, V. J. (1983), “On Creon, “Antigone”, and Not Burying the Dead”: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 126 3/4 (1983) 193-211.
SCABUZZO, S. (1999), “Tragedia y códigos legales. Una nueva lectura de Antígona de Sófocles”: Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 9 (1999) 109-127.
SCHEIN, S. (1988), “Philía in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Mètis. Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 3.1-2 (1988) 179-206.
SEGAL, C. (1992a), “Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’: Female Death and Male Tears”: Classical Antiquity 11.1 (1992) 142-158.
SEGAL, C. (1992b), “Admetus’ Divided House: Spatial Dichotomies and Gender Roles in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Materiale e discussioni per l’analisi di texti classici 28 (1992) 9-26.
SHAPIRO, H. A. (1991), “The Iconography of Mourning in Athenian Art”: American Journal of Archaeology 95.4 (1991) 629-656.
SMITH, W. D. (1960), “The Ironic Structure in ‘Alcestis’”: Phoenix 14.3 (1960), 127-145.
STANTON, G. R. (1990), “Philía and Xenía in Euripides’ Alkestis”: Hermes 181.1 (1990) 42-54.
STEARS, K. (1998), “Death becomes her. Gender and Athenian death ritual”: S. BLUNDELL, M. WILLIAMSON (1998), The Sacred and the Femenine in Ancient Greece. London, Routledge, 89-100.
VAN WEES, H. (2005), “The Invention of the Female Mind: Women, Property and Gender Ideology in Archaic Greece”: https://chs.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/women_property_vanwees.pdf.
TRAMMELL, E. (1944), “The Mute Alcestis”: The Classical Journal 37.3 (1944) 144-150.
ZORN, J. (2006), “Rhetorical Feminism in Euripides’ ‘Medea’”: The Classical Outlook 83.4 (2006) 129-130.
ASPER, M. (2005), “Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason”: AION. Annali dell' Università degli Studi di Napoli 'L'Orientale' 26 (2005) 74-94.
CAIRNS, D. (2014), “Euripides’ Medea: Feminism or Misogyny?”: D. Stuttard (2014), Looking at Medea. Essays and a Translation of Euripides’ Tragedy. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 123-137.
CHESTERTON, G. K. (2010), Chaucer. Sevilla, Renacimiento.
CONACHER, D. J. (1984), “Structural Aspects of Euripides’ Alcestis”: D. GERBER (1984), Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, Calif., Scholars Press, 73-81.
DALE, A. M. (1978), Alcestis. Edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DELLNER, J. J. (2000), “Alcestis’ Double Life”: The Classical Journal 96.1 (2000) 1-25.
DIGGLE, J. (1984), Euripidis Fabulae. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.
ETXABE, J. (2009), “Antigone’s Nomos”: Animus. The Canada Journal of Philosophy and Humanities 13 (2009) 60-73.
FINLEY, M. I. (1980), “Aristóteles y el análisis económico”: M. I. FINLEY (1980), Vieja y nueva democracia. Barcelona, Ariel, 169-206.
FLORY, S. (1978), “Medea’s Right Hand: Promises and Revenge”: Transactions of the American Philological Association 108 (1978) 69-74.
GIOMBINI, S. (2018), “The Law in Euripides’ Medea”: Revista Archai 22 (2018) 219-228.
GREGORY, J. (1979), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Hermes 107.3 (1979) 259-270.
GRIFFITH, M. (1999), Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HARRIES, E. M. (2006), “Antigone The Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos”: E. M. HARRIES (2006), Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 41-80.
HARTOUNI, V. (1983), “Antigone’s Dilemma: A Problem in Political Membership”: Hypatia 1.1 (1983) 3-20.
LLOYD, M. (1985), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Greece & Rome 32 (1985) 119-131.
MCCLURE, L. (2017), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester, Wiley, Blackwell.
MASTRONARDE, D. J. (2002), Euripides. Medea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MEIKLE, S. (2000), “Quality and Quantity: The Metaphysical Construction of the Economic Realm”: New Literary History 31.2 (2000) 247-268.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2016), Mortal y fúnebre. Leer la Ilíada. Madrid, Dioptrías.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2019), El llanto y la pólis. Madrid, La Oficina de Arte y Ediciones.
MORRIS, I. (1989), “Attitudes Toward Death in Archaic Greece”: Classical Antiquity 8.2 (1989) 296-320.
MULGAN, R. (1999), “The Role of Friendship in Aristotle’s Political Theory”: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2.4 (1999) 15-32.
MUNTEANU, D. L. (2020), “Women’s Voices in Euripides”: A. MARKANTONATOS (2020), Brills’ Companion to Euripides. Vol. 1. Leiden, Brill, 889-910.
MURNAGHAN, S. (1999), “The Survivor’s Song: The Drama of Mourning in Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’”: Illinois Classical Studies 24/25 (1999) 107-116.
NANCY, C. (1984), “Euripides et la partie de femmes”: Quaderni Urbinati Di Cultura Classica 17.2 (1984) 111-136.
PODLECKI, A. J. (1966), “Creon and Herodotus”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97 (1966) 359-371.
REINHARDT, K. (1968), “Die Sinneskrise bei Euripides”: E. SCHWINGE (1968), Euripides. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 507-542.
ROSIVACH, V. J. (1983), “On Creon, “Antigone”, and Not Burying the Dead”: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 126 3/4 (1983) 193-211.
SCABUZZO, S. (1999), “Tragedia y códigos legales. Una nueva lectura de Antígona de Sófocles”: Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 9 (1999) 109-127.
SCHEIN, S. (1988), “Philía in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Mètis. Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 3.1-2 (1988) 179-206.
SEGAL, C. (1992a), “Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’: Female Death and Male Tears”: Classical Antiquity 11.1 (1992) 142-158.
SEGAL, C. (1992b), “Admetus’ Divided House: Spatial Dichotomies and Gender Roles in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Materiale e discussioni per l’analisi di texti classici 28 (1992) 9-26.
SHAPIRO, H. A. (1991), “The Iconography of Mourning in Athenian Art”: American Journal of Archaeology 95.4 (1991) 629-656.
SMITH, W. D. (1960), “The Ironic Structure in ‘Alcestis’”: Phoenix 14.3 (1960), 127-145.
STANTON, G. R. (1990), “Philía and Xenía in Euripides’ Alkestis”: Hermes 181.1 (1990) 42-54.
STEARS, K. (1998), “Death becomes her. Gender and Athenian death ritual”: S. BLUNDELL, M. WILLIAMSON (1998), The Sacred and the Femenine in Ancient Greece. London, Routledge, 89-100.
VAN WEES, H. (2005), “The Invention of the Female Mind: Women, Property and Gender Ideology in Archaic Greece”: https://chs.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/women_property_vanwees.pdf.
TRAMMELL, E. (1944), “The Mute Alcestis”: The Classical Journal 37.3 (1944) 144-150.
ZORN, J. (2006), “Rhetorical Feminism in Euripides’ ‘Medea’”: The Classical Outlook 83.4 (2006) 129-130.
Publicado
2022-03-22
Secção
Artigos
