Eurípides: una inversión
Keywords:
polis;, women;, equality;, community;
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to clarify the relationship between the Greek political project (the polis) and the figures of women in the tragedies of Euripides, especially in Alcestis and Medea. It argues that the reasons why women are increasingly excluded from the political realm are also the reasons why their voices are to be heard once that project is consummated.
References
ALLEN, D. (2005), “Greek Tragedy and Law”: M. GAGARIN (2005), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 374-393.
ASPER, M. (2005), “Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason”: AION. Annali dell' Università degli Studi di Napoli 'L'Orientale' 26 (2005) 74-94.
CAIRNS, D. (2014), “Euripides’ Medea: Feminism or Misogyny?”: D. Stuttard (2014), Looking at Medea. Essays and a Translation of Euripides’ Tragedy. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 123-137.
CHESTERTON, G. K. (2010), Chaucer. Sevilla, Renacimiento.
CONACHER, D. J. (1984), “Structural Aspects of Euripides’ Alcestis”: D. GERBER (1984), Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, Calif., Scholars Press, 73-81.
DALE, A. M. (1978), Alcestis. Edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DELLNER, J. J. (2000), “Alcestis’ Double Life”: The Classical Journal 96.1 (2000) 1-25.
DIGGLE, J. (1984), Euripidis Fabulae. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.
ETXABE, J. (2009), “Antigone’s Nomos”: Animus. The Canada Journal of Philosophy and Humanities 13 (2009) 60-73.
FINLEY, M. I. (1980), “Aristóteles y el análisis económico”: M. I. FINLEY (1980), Vieja y nueva democracia. Barcelona, Ariel, 169-206.
FLORY, S. (1978), “Medea’s Right Hand: Promises and Revenge”: Transactions of the American Philological Association 108 (1978) 69-74.
GIOMBINI, S. (2018), “The Law in Euripides’ Medea”: Revista Archai 22 (2018) 219-228.
GREGORY, J. (1979), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Hermes 107.3 (1979) 259-270.
GRIFFITH, M. (1999), Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HARRIES, E. M. (2006), “Antigone The Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos”: E. M. HARRIES (2006), Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 41-80.
HARTOUNI, V. (1983), “Antigone’s Dilemma: A Problem in Political Membership”: Hypatia 1.1 (1983) 3-20.
LLOYD, M. (1985), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Greece & Rome 32 (1985) 119-131.
MCCLURE, L. (2017), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester, Wiley, Blackwell.
MASTRONARDE, D. J. (2002), Euripides. Medea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MEIKLE, S. (2000), “Quality and Quantity: The Metaphysical Construction of the Economic Realm”: New Literary History 31.2 (2000) 247-268.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2016), Mortal y fúnebre. Leer la Ilíada. Madrid, Dioptrías.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2019), El llanto y la pólis. Madrid, La Oficina de Arte y Ediciones.
MORRIS, I. (1989), “Attitudes Toward Death in Archaic Greece”: Classical Antiquity 8.2 (1989) 296-320.
MULGAN, R. (1999), “The Role of Friendship in Aristotle’s Political Theory”: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2.4 (1999) 15-32.
MUNTEANU, D. L. (2020), “Women’s Voices in Euripides”: A. MARKANTONATOS (2020), Brills’ Companion to Euripides. Vol. 1. Leiden, Brill, 889-910.
MURNAGHAN, S. (1999), “The Survivor’s Song: The Drama of Mourning in Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’”: Illinois Classical Studies 24/25 (1999) 107-116.
NANCY, C. (1984), “Euripides et la partie de femmes”: Quaderni Urbinati Di Cultura Classica 17.2 (1984) 111-136.
PODLECKI, A. J. (1966), “Creon and Herodotus”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97 (1966) 359-371.
REINHARDT, K. (1968), “Die Sinneskrise bei Euripides”: E. SCHWINGE (1968), Euripides. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 507-542.
ROSIVACH, V. J. (1983), “On Creon, “Antigone”, and Not Burying the Dead”: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 126 3/4 (1983) 193-211.
SCABUZZO, S. (1999), “Tragedia y códigos legales. Una nueva lectura de Antígona de Sófocles”: Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 9 (1999) 109-127.
SCHEIN, S. (1988), “Philía in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Mètis. Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 3.1-2 (1988) 179-206.
SEGAL, C. (1992a), “Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’: Female Death and Male Tears”: Classical Antiquity 11.1 (1992) 142-158.
SEGAL, C. (1992b), “Admetus’ Divided House: Spatial Dichotomies and Gender Roles in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Materiale e discussioni per l’analisi di texti classici 28 (1992) 9-26.
SHAPIRO, H. A. (1991), “The Iconography of Mourning in Athenian Art”: American Journal of Archaeology 95.4 (1991) 629-656.
SMITH, W. D. (1960), “The Ironic Structure in ‘Alcestis’”: Phoenix 14.3 (1960), 127-145.
STANTON, G. R. (1990), “Philía and Xenía in Euripides’ Alkestis”: Hermes 181.1 (1990) 42-54.
STEARS, K. (1998), “Death becomes her. Gender and Athenian death ritual”: S. BLUNDELL, M. WILLIAMSON (1998), The Sacred and the Femenine in Ancient Greece. London, Routledge, 89-100.
VAN WEES, H. (2005), “The Invention of the Female Mind: Women, Property and Gender Ideology in Archaic Greece”: https://chs.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/women_property_vanwees.pdf.
TRAMMELL, E. (1944), “The Mute Alcestis”: The Classical Journal 37.3 (1944) 144-150.
ZORN, J. (2006), “Rhetorical Feminism in Euripides’ ‘Medea’”: The Classical Outlook 83.4 (2006) 129-130.
ASPER, M. (2005), “Law and Logic: Towards an Archaeology of Greek Abstract Reason”: AION. Annali dell' Università degli Studi di Napoli 'L'Orientale' 26 (2005) 74-94.
CAIRNS, D. (2014), “Euripides’ Medea: Feminism or Misogyny?”: D. Stuttard (2014), Looking at Medea. Essays and a Translation of Euripides’ Tragedy. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 123-137.
CHESTERTON, G. K. (2010), Chaucer. Sevilla, Renacimiento.
CONACHER, D. J. (1984), “Structural Aspects of Euripides’ Alcestis”: D. GERBER (1984), Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury. Chico, Calif., Scholars Press, 73-81.
DALE, A. M. (1978), Alcestis. Edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DELLNER, J. J. (2000), “Alcestis’ Double Life”: The Classical Journal 96.1 (2000) 1-25.
DIGGLE, J. (1984), Euripidis Fabulae. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.
ETXABE, J. (2009), “Antigone’s Nomos”: Animus. The Canada Journal of Philosophy and Humanities 13 (2009) 60-73.
FINLEY, M. I. (1980), “Aristóteles y el análisis económico”: M. I. FINLEY (1980), Vieja y nueva democracia. Barcelona, Ariel, 169-206.
FLORY, S. (1978), “Medea’s Right Hand: Promises and Revenge”: Transactions of the American Philological Association 108 (1978) 69-74.
GIOMBINI, S. (2018), “The Law in Euripides’ Medea”: Revista Archai 22 (2018) 219-228.
GREGORY, J. (1979), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Hermes 107.3 (1979) 259-270.
GRIFFITH, M. (1999), Sophocles. Antigone. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HARRIES, E. M. (2006), “Antigone The Lawyer, or the Ambiguities of Nomos”: E. M. HARRIES (2006), Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 41-80.
HARTOUNI, V. (1983), “Antigone’s Dilemma: A Problem in Political Membership”: Hypatia 1.1 (1983) 3-20.
LLOYD, M. (1985), “Euripides’ Alcestis”: Greece & Rome 32 (1985) 119-131.
MCCLURE, L. (2017), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester, Wiley, Blackwell.
MASTRONARDE, D. J. (2002), Euripides. Medea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MEIKLE, S. (2000), “Quality and Quantity: The Metaphysical Construction of the Economic Realm”: New Literary History 31.2 (2000) 247-268.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2016), Mortal y fúnebre. Leer la Ilíada. Madrid, Dioptrías.
MÍGUEZ BARCIELA, A. (2019), El llanto y la pólis. Madrid, La Oficina de Arte y Ediciones.
MORRIS, I. (1989), “Attitudes Toward Death in Archaic Greece”: Classical Antiquity 8.2 (1989) 296-320.
MULGAN, R. (1999), “The Role of Friendship in Aristotle’s Political Theory”: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2.4 (1999) 15-32.
MUNTEANU, D. L. (2020), “Women’s Voices in Euripides”: A. MARKANTONATOS (2020), Brills’ Companion to Euripides. Vol. 1. Leiden, Brill, 889-910.
MURNAGHAN, S. (1999), “The Survivor’s Song: The Drama of Mourning in Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’”: Illinois Classical Studies 24/25 (1999) 107-116.
NANCY, C. (1984), “Euripides et la partie de femmes”: Quaderni Urbinati Di Cultura Classica 17.2 (1984) 111-136.
PODLECKI, A. J. (1966), “Creon and Herodotus”: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 97 (1966) 359-371.
REINHARDT, K. (1968), “Die Sinneskrise bei Euripides”: E. SCHWINGE (1968), Euripides. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 507-542.
ROSIVACH, V. J. (1983), “On Creon, “Antigone”, and Not Burying the Dead”: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 126 3/4 (1983) 193-211.
SCABUZZO, S. (1999), “Tragedia y códigos legales. Una nueva lectura de Antígona de Sófocles”: Cuadernos de Filología Clásica 9 (1999) 109-127.
SCHEIN, S. (1988), “Philía in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Mètis. Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 3.1-2 (1988) 179-206.
SEGAL, C. (1992a), “Euripides’ ‘Alcestis’: Female Death and Male Tears”: Classical Antiquity 11.1 (1992) 142-158.
SEGAL, C. (1992b), “Admetus’ Divided House: Spatial Dichotomies and Gender Roles in Euripides’ Alcestis”: Materiale e discussioni per l’analisi di texti classici 28 (1992) 9-26.
SHAPIRO, H. A. (1991), “The Iconography of Mourning in Athenian Art”: American Journal of Archaeology 95.4 (1991) 629-656.
SMITH, W. D. (1960), “The Ironic Structure in ‘Alcestis’”: Phoenix 14.3 (1960), 127-145.
STANTON, G. R. (1990), “Philía and Xenía in Euripides’ Alkestis”: Hermes 181.1 (1990) 42-54.
STEARS, K. (1998), “Death becomes her. Gender and Athenian death ritual”: S. BLUNDELL, M. WILLIAMSON (1998), The Sacred and the Femenine in Ancient Greece. London, Routledge, 89-100.
VAN WEES, H. (2005), “The Invention of the Female Mind: Women, Property and Gender Ideology in Archaic Greece”: https://chs.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/women_property_vanwees.pdf.
TRAMMELL, E. (1944), “The Mute Alcestis”: The Classical Journal 37.3 (1944) 144-150.
ZORN, J. (2006), “Rhetorical Feminism in Euripides’ ‘Medea’”: The Classical Outlook 83.4 (2006) 129-130.
Published
2022-03-22
Section
Articles
